hole in the water. Waste of public money. Money thrown out the window. This seems the real result of the last attempt of the Italian parliamentarians to influence what looks like a foregone conclusion: the non-extradition of terrorist Battisti. Why '? We try to explain it.
In these days in Brasilia Italian is spoken.
it happens during the week of Brazilian Carnival we were honored by the presence of two delegations of Italian parliamentarians who came to Brazil groped to influence the outcome of the process of extradition. None other than the vice-chairman of the House in the company of Mr Maurizio Lupi door (at the express request of President Fini) met the newly elected president of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies, Michel fear. The interview-
''a release from the press office of Wolf-allowed to send a clear message authoritative and warm attention and high expectations of a positive outcome of the case Baptists. "The two also stressed''the lively expectation of the Assembly and all the Italian institutions about a ruling of the Supreme Federal Tribunal in favor of extradition Cesare Battisti. "
And there was need to come to Brasilia after a close around Brazil to demonstrate this expectation? And as' the travel cost of our MPs: 10, 20, 30 000 €? All this for a hole in the water?
At the same time the delegation of the Association of friendship between Italy and Brazil, made by the president for the Italian Domenico Scilipoti (IDV) and the Secretary Carlo Monai and the Brazilian President Mauricio Trindade, met the Deputy Minister, Pedro Abramovay, Senator Eduardo Suplicy and Congressman Jose Eduard Cardezo to discuss the case of Cesare Battisti. Moreover, the two Italian MPs have met with Senator Jose Sarney, President of the Brazilian Federal Senate for the same reason. Same result and probably the same cost of the trip. We do not know if the cost of this trip and 'a load of our Parliament and we turn to this question directly responsible.
With the exception of Mr Porta, who lives in Brazil and that it 'prefers to come here, the explanation most' plausible for a trip during the Carnival period to influence the outcome of the extradition process that depends on the decision of the Supreme Federal Tribunal and 'the carnival itself. Why '? tell you, my readers.
Well the point and 'the following: both the Brazilian Minister of Justice that the President had already' made it clear that for them the case and 'closed. The only option 'put everything into question, and' if the Federal Supreme Court declaring the illegitimacy 'of the rule by the Minister of Justice the decision of an extradition process.
Let me ask you a question. The Supreme Court is equivalent to our Federal Constitutional Court. Now if the Italian Constitutional Court were to decide to legitimacy 'or otherwise of a Italian legislation, it would make sense to meet the Speaker of the House or the Senate to influence the decision of 'High Court? Even a law student would answer that it would be an absurd claim. Hence the result would be an expected hole in the water.
If the travel costs of both delegations were charged to the Italian Parliament, it would probably cost a minimum of € 50,000. Money that could be used for the Italian emigrants in conditions of poverty in South America. If you give 500 € to 100 head could assist the poor, which is not 'little.
But then why 'our MPs (with the exception of a door) came in Brazil, since che era prevedibile il buco nell’acqua?
Ma come non pensarci? Vedere il Carnevale, nel Sambodromo, a spese del Parlamento italiano.
0 comments:
Post a Comment